Cutting tool insert and method for producing the same

ABSTRACT

An improved cutting tool insert and a method for the preparation of such cutting tool insert, having a sintered alumina and silicon carbide whisker composite material body, comprising the steps of milling and mixing the powdered starting materials of said composite material and forming said material into a preformed workpiece, heating up said workpiece at a heating rate of from about 20 to about 60° C. per minute to a sintering temperature of between from about 1600 to about 2300° C., and holding at said sintering temperature for a holding time of from about 5 to about 60 minutes at a pressure of between from about 20 to about 100 MPa.

RELATED APPLICATION DATA

This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser.No. 10/763,260, filed Jan. 26, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,175,798, whichclaims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 or § 365 toApplication No. EP 03001757.8, filed in Europe on Jan. 28, 2003. Theentire disclosure of each of the prior applications is considered asbeing part of the disclosure of the present application and is herebyincorporated by reference therein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a cutting tool insert of an improvedceramic material, and a method for preparing the same.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Ceramic materials for cutting tool applications include alumina,alumina-zirconia, alumina-TiC—TiN, silicon nitride, sialon, andSiC-whisker reinforced alumina. The cutting tool environment putssimultaneous high demands on the strength, toughness and thermal shockresistance in addition to the obvious demands for high wear resistance.

The mechanical properties of ceramic materials are to a high extentinfluenced by internal and external defects, such as inclusions offoreign matter, pores, large grains and cracks. In order to improvereliability and performance of cutting tools made of ceramic materials,it is necessary to identify detrimental defects in the products and toset up the processing route in order to minimize undesirable features.Since ceramic materials have a completely elastic behavior up totemperatures of about 1000° C., the stress concentrations created by thedefects cannot be eliminated by relaxation due to plastic deformation.

Ceramic materials for metal cutting tools are produced by milling of theconstituents in a liquid and subsequent drying of the slurry. Spraydrying is the preferred drying method for materials that do not requirehot pressing. Spray drying produces granules with a size of 50-200microns. The large granules give very good powder flow properties, whichis essential for mass production of blanks with uniaxial cold pressing.

It is now well-established that defects in a sintered body can berelated to the pore size and distribution in the green compact. This isespecially important for materials that are sintered without pressure orwith low pressure (gas pressure sintering), since large pores will notbe eliminated. The granule characteristics, and especially theirdeformation behavior, will be the primary parameters that determine thedefect structure in the green state. Considerable increases in strengthof the sintered material have been achieved by reducing the granulecompression strength, since dense and hard granules will retain theirshape even after compression.

Besides pore size and pore distribution, the grain size is alsoessential to the mechanical properties of ceramic materials. A fine anduniform grain size provides for a high strength and a small variation ofthe strength. The grain size of ceramic materials is closely related tothe sintering conditions.

Alumina and alumina-zirconia materials are preferably produced byressureless sintering in an appropriate atmosphere. In many cases, thisis the preferred sintering technique for ceramic materials, since it isa relatively low-cost process and enables complex shaped parts to beproduced.

Silicon nitride and sialon materials are normally produced by gaspressure sintering, whereby a gas pressure of from about 0.1 to about 1MPa is applied, once closed porosity is reached in the material. Thisenables higher densities to be reached at lower sintering temperatures,especially when using low amounts of sintering additives to form aliquid phase.

Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) is another sintering technique that is usedfor materials that cannot be consolidated without external pressure.Pressures of from about 1 to about 10 MPa are normally used, but themethod demands an encapsulation, for example in glass, to transmit thegas pressure. HIP can also be used to remove remaining porosity afterconventional sintering or hot pressing to closed porosity, theadvantages being that HIP, due to the high pressure, is performed at alower temperature than the sintering temperature, which is why a morefine grained material is obtained.

Hot pressing (HP) is the preferred method for materials difficult to besintered, like silicon whisker reinforced alumina, and also for mixedceramics, like alumina-TiC. The pressure of normally from about 25 toabout 35 MPa is uniaxially transferred to the material with graphitepunches. Rather large cylindrical discs are obtained, which are thendiamond saw cut to the required dimensions of the blanks. The diamondsaw cutting is a rather expensive part of the blank production process,amounting to from about 30 to about 40% of the production costs perblank.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,543,345 describes a method for the production of siliconcarbide whisker reinforced alumina with from about 5 to about 60% byvolume SiC-whiskers to a sintered density of greater than 99%. Theprocess requires a pressure of from about 28 to about 70 MPa, atemperature of from about 1600 to about 1900° C., and a hold time atsintering temperature of 45 minutes to 2 hours. Pressures and sinteringtemperatures in the higher range are needed for higher whisker loadings.The combination of long sintering times and high sintering temperaturesin this hot pressing sintering method leads to alumina grain growth inspite of the grain growth inhibiting effect of the silicon carbidewhiskers. Large alumina grains will affect he performance in cuttingtool applications, since the largest defect determines the strength ofthe material.

Another method, spark plasma sintering (SPS), applies electrical energypulses directly to the gaps between the powder particles, which areplaced between graphite punches. SPS utilizes the energy of the sparkplasma generated by the spark discharges. The pressure is directlyapplied on the powder bed in an uniaxial direction.

Another method uses a particulate solid as the pressure-transmittingmedium, which is why such method is referred to as “pseudo-isostatic.”Such method can be used to consolidate preforms of more complicatedshape.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,348,694 describes a sintering method, wherein thepreformed green blank is heated by electrical resistive heating of agranular pressure-transmitting medium, which is in contact with thepreform inside a die chamber. The pressure-transmitting medium iselectrically conductive, e.g., graphitic carbon granules. Thiselectrical resistive heating method enables very high temperatures andrapid heating times, making it suitable for materials that require highsintering temperatures. The pressure that can be applied is limited bythe strength of the material in the rams and die, which for hightemperatures is normally graphite. The pressure is therefore usually notmuch higher than about 100 MPa.

OBJECT AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is the object of this invention to provide a cutting tool inserthaving a sintered alumina and silicon carbide whisker composite materialbody and a method for preparing the same, wherein the cutting toolinsert exhibits improved wear resistance and toughness behavior in metalcutting applications.

In one aspect there is provided a method for the preparation of acutting tool insert comprising the steps of milling and mixing powdersof alumina and silicon carbide whiskers; forming said mixture into apreformed workpiece; holding said workpiece at a heating rate of 20 to60° C. per minute to a sintering temperature of between 1600 to 2300°C.; and holding at said sintering temperature for a holding time of 5 to60 minutes at a pressure of between 20 to 100 MPa.

In addition, there is provided the product made by the above-describedprocess.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 a is a scanning electron micrograph in 8000 times magnificationof a sample produced according to the method of the present invention,described in example 1 below and being treated according to Example 5below;

FIG. 1 b is the micrograph of FIG. 1 a after image processing asdescribed in Example 5 below;

FIG. 2 a is a scanning electron micrograph in 8000 times magnificationof a commercially available grade (commercial grade A, see Example 6below), being treated according to Example 5 below;

FIG. 2 b is the micrograph of FIG. 2 a after image processing asdescribed in Example 5 below;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The method of the present invention will herein be referred to as “rapidsintering.” The method combines the use of high sintering temperature, ahigh temperature rise up to the sintering temperature, short holdingtimes at the sintering temperature and at the same time, the applicationof a high pressure. The method of the present invention, having combinedthe aforementioned parameters, results in a whisker reinforced ceramicmaterial for cutting tools with improved performance due to inhibitionof defects due to grain growth. The method maintains a fine and uniformalumina grain size due to rapid heating, the sintering temperature and ashort holding time at this temperature while maintaining full shrinkageand densification. The cutting tools produced according to the method ofthe present invention exhibit superior wear resistance and toughnessbehavior over similar cutting tool materials having the samecomposition, but produced by a different sintering method.

A very surprising effect has been observed by the present inventor,which will be discussed and evidenced in more detail below: Twomaterials of the same composition have been produced by the hot pressingsintering method and according to the method of the present invention,respectively. Both materials showed very similar or almost identicalmechanical properties and microstructure characteristics in respect ofdensity, hardness, fracture toughness, and strength. But surprisinglythe material produced according to the method of the present inventionshowed much better cutting tool performance in respect of tool life andnotch wear.

The afore-mentioned difference in tool performance of the materialproduced according to the present invention is referred to a combinationof the mean alumina grain size and other micro-structural materialproperties, which have not yet been explained in detail, but whichappear to be closely related and a result of the sintering processconditions specified in this invention. Accordingly, in a preferredembodiment of the cutting tool insert produced by the method of thepresent invention the mean alumina grain size is 2.0 μm or less,preferably less than 1.5 μm, more preferred less than 1.0 μm, and mostpreferred less than 0.9 μm.

It has further been found that the improved performance of the cuttingtool insert of the present invention seems to be related to a low widthof the alumina grain size distribution. Since the alumina grain sizedistribution in the material of the present invention does not follow anideal Gaussian distribution, but is rather asymmetric, the grain sizestandard deviation is not a useful measure for the alumina grain sizedistribution. The alumina grain size distribution is thereforedetermined by the 80^(th) percentile (P80) of the width of the aluminagrain sizes. P80 is the value of the alumina grain size (d), such that80% of all alumina grain size measurements are less than that value.

Improved performance of the cutting tool insert of the present inventionis found in a embodiment wherein the alumina in the composite materialhas a 80^(th) percentile (P80) of less than 2.5 μm, preferably less than2.0 μm, more preferred less than 1.8 μm, most preferred less than 1.3μm.

It has been found that these mean diameter and P80 values of the aluminain the composite material of the invention are achieved by applying therapid sintering method according to the present invention, whereasstandard hot pressing results in higher mean diameter and higher P80values accompanied by inferior cutting tool performance.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the rapid sintering methodcomprises the steps of heating up the workpiece to be sintered byapplying electrical energy in the form of a DC current, that at leastpartially goes through said workpiece. In another preferred embodiment,said current may either be unpulsed or pulsed DC current.

In another preferred embodiment, the method of the present inventionincludes the rapid sintering method, as it is described in U.S. Pat. No.5,348,694 hereinafter incorporated in full by reference. Accordingly,the method of the present invention comprises the steps of providing abed comprising a bed material of electrically conductive, flowableparticles within a contained zone, placing the workpiece in the bed,applying a pressure to said bed, applying electrical energy to saidelectrically conductive, flowable particles within the bed in asufficient amount to heat the bed to the desired sintering temperaturefor the workpiece within the desired heating rate. This method allowsfor a rapid heating up to the sintering temperature at a steep heatingramp at a desired pressure of up to 100 MPa. This method allows for highsintering temperatures compared to other known sintering methods withhigh heating rates. The method further allows at the same time for highsintering pressures to 100 MPa, depending on the strength of thegraphite tools. The bed material of electrically conductive, flowableparticles, useful in the method of the present invention, comprisesgraphite, preferably spherical graphite or carbided graphitic material.

Rapid sintering according to the present invention includes a highheating rate or steep heating ramp, respectively, high sinteringtemperatures, and short sintering times. All of these parameters havebeen found contribute to small alumina grain sizes, small P80 values andto superior tool performance, which seems to be the result of acombination of said small alumina grain sizes, small P80 values and oneor more other parameters, which is/are resulting from the rapidsintering method.

Thus, in another preferred embodiment of the method of the presentinvention, the sintering temperature is between from about 1800 to about2100° C., more preferably between from about 1900 to about 2000° C. Theheating rate is preferably from about 20 to about 40° C. per minute, andmost preferably about 25° C. per minute.

Even though holding times up to 60 minutes may be applied, depending onthe composition of the material, shorter holding times are preferred toavoid alumina grain growth. In a preferred embodiment, the holding timeis from about 5 to about 30 minutes, more preferably from about 10 toabout 20 minutes, and most preferably about 15 minutes.

A useful pressure for the method of the invention lies within the rangeof from about 20 to about 100 MPa. In a more preferred embodiment, thepressure is from about 30 to about 100 MPa, most preferably from about40 to about 100 MPa. In most cases a pressure of about 50 MPa issuitable.

In another preferred embodiment, the composite material producedaccording to the method of the present invention comprises alumina plussilicon carbide whiskers in a total proportion of at least 90% byvolume. The proportion of silicon carbide whiskers in said compositematerial is preferably from about 5 to about 70% by volume, morepreferably from about 15 to about 50% by volume, and most preferred fromabout 20 to about 45% by volume.

The composite material produced according to the method of the presentinvention may additionally comprise a certain amount of sinteringadditives like magnesia or yttria. In a preferred embodiment of thepresent invention, magnesia and/or yttria may each be comprised in thecomposite material in a proportion of from about 0.01 to about 5% byweight, preferably in a proportion of from about 0.02 to about 1% byweight, most preferred in a proportion of from about 0.03 to about 0.5%by weight.

The invention is additionally illustrated in connection with thefollowing Examples which are to be considered as illustrative of thepresent invention. It should be understood, however, that the inventionis not limited to the specific details of the Examples.

EXAMPLE 1

For comparison, cutting tool inserts of alumina-silicon carbide whiskercomposite material were prepared, both conventionally with hot pressingand by rapid sintering according to the present invention, using adirect electrically heated powder bed with preforms of the material tobe sintered. In this and the following examples, the method of thepresent invention will simply be designated as “rapid sintering.”

A mixture of 71% by volume alumina (Ceralox APA, −0.3 μm grain size) and29% by volume silicon carbide whiskers (Advanced Composite MaterialsCorp. SC-9, average diameter −0.6 μm) were put together. 0.04% by weighteach of magnesia (Magnesium Electron Ltd.) and yttria (A.C. Starck,grade standard) as sintering additives and 1.25% by weight PVA (Mowiol4-88), 1.5% by weight PEG300 (Pluriol E-300), and 1.5% by weight PEG1500(Pluriol E-1500) as pressing aids to enable uniaxial cold pressing wereadded, and the composition was wet-milled to obtain a homogeneousmixture.

For the conventional preparation with hot pressing (HP), the mixture wasfreeze dried to obtain granules, cold pressed into a disc, andpresintered at 600° C. for one hour in air to remove the pressing aid.Subsequently, the material was hot pressed for one hour at 1875° C. and25 MPa. The sintered disc was diamond saw cut into blanks, which werethen ground to inserts with ISO-designation RNGN 120700 T01020.

For preparation with rapid sintering according to the present invention,the mixture was freeze dried to obtain granules, cold pressed intoblanks, which were then presintered at 600° C. for one hour in air toremove the pressing aid. The blanks were then coated with a thinBN-layer to prevent reaction with the graphite of the electricallyheated powder bed. The same coating with a BN-layer had been applied tothe above material in the hot pressing of discs. The blanks were thenplaced in a die chamber filled with electrically conductive graphiticcarbon, whereby a porous graphitic carbon of spheroidal form (SuperiorGraphite Co., grade 9400) was used. Heating was done by passing anelectrical current through the medium. The temperature was raised with25° C. per minute, and the sintering temperature was 1925° C., which washeld for 15 minutes at a pressure of 50 MPa. Blank temperature wascalculated as a function of time and location in the die, using acomputer model. The blanks were then allowed to cool down in thefurnace, and no additional heat treatment was performed. Aftersintering, the blanks were ground to inserts with ISO-designation RNGN120700 T01020.

EXAMPLE 2

The samples (blanks) of Example 1 (prepared by hot pressing and rapidsintering, respectively) were tested in a grooving operation in heatresistant alloy of the type Inconel 718. A groove was widened in twocuts by a total of about 30%. Tool life was reached when the largestdimension of a damage on the flank or rake face exceeded 1 mm.

The following cutting conditions were used:

Cutting fluid: yes Cutting speed: 250 m/min Feed: 0.15 and 0.25 mm/revDepth of cut: 6 mm

TABLE 1 Number of cycles to tool life Sintering Number of Cycles FeedMethod Exp. 1 Exp. 2 Exp. 3 Exp. 4 Exp. 5 Average Relative 0.15 mm/revHot pressing 5 4 3 4 4 4 100 Rapid Sint. 6 7 5 7 5 6 150 0.25 mm/rev HotPressing 3 3 2 3 4 3 100 Rapid Sint. 3 5 3 3 5 3.8 128

At a feed rate of 0.15 mm/rev the increase in tool life is 50%, and at afeed rate of 0.25 mm/rev the increase is 28%.

EXAMPLE 3

Using the samples (blanks) of Example 1, notch wear was measured infacing operation in heat resistant alloy of the type Inconel 718.

The following cutting conditions were used:

Cutting fluid: Yes Cutting Speed: 220 m/min Depth of cut: 1.5 mm Feed:0.11 mm/rev

Notch wear was measured after two cuts.

TABLE 2 Notch wear (mm) after two cuts Sintering Notch wear (mm) aftertwo cuts Method Exp. 1 Exp. 2 Exp. 3 Exp. 4 Exp. 5 Exp. 6 AverageRelative Hot pressing 0.59 0.58 0.31 0.71 0.61 0.72 0.60 100 RapidSintering 0.43 0.21 0.27 0.58 0.46 0.66 0.45 75

With the cutting tool insert produced according to the rapid sinteringmethod of the present invention, a reduction in notch wear to about 75%was achieved, or in other words, an increase in notch wear resistance ofabout 25% was achieved.

EXAMPLE 4

The samples produced according to the methods of Example 1 werecharacterized in respect of physical and mechanical properties andmicrostructural characteristics. The measured mechanical properties weredensity, hardness, fracture toughness, and strength, which are indicatedin Table 3 below.

TABLE 3 Mechanical Properties Density Hardness Fracture ToughnessStrength Sintering Method g/cm³ HV10 GPa Mpam^(1/2)* MPa** Hot Pressing3.73 2080 ± 80 6.9 ± 0.6 995 Rapid Sintering 3.73 2110 ± 21 6.5 ± 0.21050 *Indentation (HV10) fracture toughness **Biaxial bending test, onlytwo values

There are surprisingly only small differences between the two materialswith respect to the physical and mechanical properties, considering thelarge differences in cutting performance, i.e., tool life and notchwear. It was highly surprising that two materials showing almostidentical mechanical properties in standard tests exhibited largedifferences in cutting performance. In a restrospective view, this maybe explained by the obvious differences in temperature, since mechanicalproperties are determined at room temperature, whereas duringexamination of cutting performance the cutting edge will experiencetemperatures above 1000° C. It is well-known to experts in the art thatmechanical properties and cutting tool performance often fall apart dueto this temperature difference, but it is not at all predictable whethercutting tool performance is improved or worsened.

EXAMPLE 5

A more detailed microstructural characterization on the samples,according to Example 1 above, was made with the aid of automatic imageanalysis using an image of the grain structure produced by a scanningelectrone microscope (SEM). A polished surface of a sample,perpendicular to the pressing direction, was etched in hydrogen at 1000°C. to reveal the alumina grain boundaries, and thereafter it was etchedin acid to remove any formed oxide or glassy layers. These layers areformed due to the presence of silicon carbide whiskers, which mightoxidize during heat treatment. Scanning electron micrographs in 8000times magnification were then recorded (see FIGS. 1 a and 2 a). Theimages were further processed using a computerized image analysis systemby filling in the grain boundaries with black line color by hand. Theareas covered by silicon carbide whisker grains were also filled withblack color by hand. Since the whiskers are orientated preferably in theplain perpendicular to the hot pressing direction, they are easilyidentified due to their high aspect ratio. Further image processing inthe image analyzer generated a black and white picture, where only thealumina grain boundaries and the SiC-whisker grains were visible tofacilitate the measurements (see FIGS. 1 b and 2 b).

Determination of the mean grain size was based on measurement of theindividual area of each grain completely within the least area border.The measurement was repeated eight times for different fields to obtainan adequate number of measurements. The equipment was calibrated, sothat area measurements were made in μm². Between from about 405 to about1150 grains were measured for each variant, depending on the grain size,which is from about 50 to about 100 grains per microscopic field. Thepixel density was 1280×960.

The equivalent grain diameter (microns) was calculated, assuming eachgrain is a perfect sphere using the formulaA _(i) =πd ₁ ²/4

-   -   Wherein: A₁=area for grain 1, and        -   d_(i)=equivalent diameter for grain i.            The mean diameter (d_(mean)) of the distribution was            calculated using the formula            d _(mean) =Σd _(i) /n.            wherein is the number of measurements.

The 80^(th) percentile (P80), which describes the width of the grainsize distribution, is the value of the alumina grain size d, such that80% of the measurements are less than that value. The calculated valuesfor mean diameter and 80^(th) percentile (P80) for the two materials ofExample 1 are indicated in the following Table 4.

TABLE 4 Alumina grain size and P80 Sintering Method Mean diameter(microns) P80 (microns) Hot Pressing 1.26 1.93 Rapid Sintering (15 min)0.77 1.12

Table 4 shows that the material produced by rapid sintering according tothe present invention has smaller alumina mean diameter and smalleralumina grain size distribution, both essential for the cuttingperformance. An increase in either of the parameters, which means anincrease in the volume fraction of relatively coarse grains, reduces thecutting performance.

EXAMPLE 6

A number of commercial materials based on alumina and silicon whiskershave been characterized with respect to alumina grain size anddistribution. All major suppliers are included in this investigation.Measurements were made in an identical manner to what is described inExample 5, and the results are presented in Table 5. The sampleaccording to the present invention was prepared according to Example 1.All commercial materials had approximately the same composition, namely25 weight-% SiC-whiskers, a small amount of sintering additives, andalumina as the remaining main constituent.

TABLE 5 Alumina grain size and P80 Grade Mean diameter (microns) P80(microns) Commercial Grade A 1.31 1.97 Commercial Grade B 1.04 1.48Commercial Grade C 1.58 2.50 Commercial Grade D 1.34 2.07 Rapidsintering (15 min) 0.77 1.12

All commercial materials showed a larger mean grain size and a largerP80 than the material according to the present invention.

EXAMPLE 7

In order to study the influence of processing parameters three differentholding times during sintering were evaluated. The samples were preparedaccording to the inventive method of Example 1, except for varyingsintering times, i.e., the temperature increase was 25° C. per minute,the sintering temperature was 1925° C. (in case of 10 min holding time,the sintering temperature was slightly higher: 1950° C.), and thepressure was 50 MPa for all variants. The sintering times were 10 min,15 min, and 22 min. After sintering, the blanks were ground into insertswith ISO designation RNGN 120700 T01020.

The mean alumina grain diameter and P80 were evaluated, using the samemethod, as described for the previous examples. The results are shown inTable 6.

TABLE 6 Sintering temp. Mean diameter Sintering time (min) (° C.)(microns) P80 (microns) 10 1950 0.88 1.26 15 1925 0.77 1.12 22 1925 1.201.73

Hardness, fracture toughness and density were also evaluated for theprocessing variants. The results are shown in Table 7.

TABLE 7 Fracture Sintering time Sintering temp. Density Hardnesstoughness (min) (° C.) (g/cm³) (GPa) (Mpa m^(1/2)*) 10 1950 3.72 2043 ±16 5.8 ± 0.1 15 1925 3.73 2110 ± 21 6.5 ± 0.2 22 1925 3.70-3.73 2088 ±33 5.6 ± 0.6 *Indentation (HV10) fracture toughness

EXAMPLE 8

Notch wear of the processing variants of Example 7 was measured in afacing operation in heat resistant alloy of the type inconel 718. Two ofthe above mentioned commercial materials were used as references.Commercial Grade A with a mean grain size typical for most investigatedcommercial grades and Grade B with the smallest mean grain size of themeasured commercial materials.

The following cutting conditions were used:

Cutting fluid: Yes Cutting speed: 220 m/min Depth of cut: 1.5 mm Feed:0.11 mm/rev

Notch wear was measured after four cuts.

TABLE 8 Notch wear (mm) after four cuts Grade Notch wear (mm; median)Relative Commercial Grade A 0.84 311 Commercial Grade B 0.59 219 Rapidsintering 10 min 0.61 226 Rapid sintering 15 min 0.27 100 Rapidsintering 22 min 0.77 285

The notch wear resistance is sensitive to sintering time. The best notchwear resistance was achieved for the 15 min sintering time. The aluminagrain size is one parameter governing the notch wear resistance, butcannot alone explain the results.

EXAMPLE 9

The samples of the preceding Example 8 were also tested in a groovingoperation in heat resistant alloy of the type Iconel 718. A groove waswidened in two cuts by a total of about 30%. Tool life was reached whenthe largest dimension of a damage on the flank or rake face exceed 1 mm.

The following cutting conditions were used:

Cutting fluid: Yes Cutting speed: 250 m/min Feed: 0.25 mm/rev Depth ofcut: 6 mm

TABLE 9 Number of cycles to tool life Number of Cycles Variant Exp. 1Exp. 2 Average Relative Commercial Grade A 8 10 11 183 (prior art)Commercial Grade B 7 5 6 100 (prior art) Rapid sintering 10 min 14 1313.5 225 Rapid sintering 15 min 13 11 12 200 Rapid sintering 22 min 8 56.5 108

The principles, preferred embodiments and modes of operation of thepresent invention have been described in the foregoing specification.The invention which is intended to be protected herein, however, is notto be construed as limited to the particular forms disclosed, sincethese are to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive.Variations and changes may be made by those skilled in the art withoutdeparting from the spirit of the invention.

1. A cutting tool insert comprising: a sintered alumina and siliconcarbide whisker composite material body, wherein the proportion ofsilicon carbide whiskers in said composite material is from about 5 toabout 50% by volume and wherein an alumina grain size in said compositematerial has a 80^(th) percentile (P80) of less than 2.5 μm.
 2. Thecutting tool insert of claim 1, wherein said alumina in said compositematerial has a mean diameter of less than 2.0 μm.
 3. The cutting toolinsert of claim 2, wherein said alumina in said composite material has amean diameter of less than 1.5 μm.
 4. The cutting tool insert of claim3, wherein said alumina in said composite material has a mean diameterof less than 1.0 μm.
 5. The cutting tool insert of claim 4, wherein saidalumina in said composite material has a mean diameter of less than 0.9μm.
 6. The cutting tool insert of claim 2, wherein said alumina in saidcomposite material has a 80^(th) percentile (P80) of less than 2.0 μm.7. The cutting tool insert of claim 6, wherein said alumina in saidcomposite material has a 80^(th) percentile (P80) of less than 1.8 μm.8. The cutting tool insert of claim 7, wherein said alumina in saidcomposite material has a 80^(th) percentile (P80) of less than 1.3 μm.9. The cutting tool insert of claim 1, wherein the proportion of aluminaplus silicon carbide whiskers in said composite material is at least 90percent by volume.
 10. The cutting tool insert of claim 9, wherein theproportion of alumina plus silicon carbide whiskers in said compositematerial is at least 95 percent by volume.
 11. The cutting tool insertof claim 1, wherein the proportion of silicon carbide whiskers in saidcomposite material is from about 15 to about 50% by volume.
 12. Thecutting tool insert of claim 11, wherein the proportion of siliconcarbide whiskers in said composite material is from about 20 to about45% by volume.
 13. The cutting tool insert of claim 1, wherein thecutting tool insert is prepared by a process including the steps of:milling and mixing powders of alumina and silicon carbide whiskers,forming said mixture into a preformed workpiece, heating said workpieceat a heating rate of from about 20 to about 60° C. per minute to asintering temperature of between from 1800 to about 2300° C., andholding said workpiece at said sintering temperature for a holding timeof from about 5 to about 60 minutes at a pressure of between 20 to 100MPa.
 14. The cutting tool insert of claim 13, wherein heating is byapplying electrical energy in the form of a DC current that at leastpartially goes through said workpiece.
 15. The cutting tool insert ofclaim 14, wherein said DC current is unpulsed.
 16. The cutting toolinsert of claim 14, wherein said DC current is pulsed.
 17. The cuttingtool insert of claim 13, comprising providing a bed including a bedmaterial of electrically conductive, flowable particles within acontained zone, placing the preformed workpiece in said bed, andapplying a pressure to said bed, and heating up said workpiece byapplying electrical energy to said electrically conductive, flowableparticles within said heating rate.
 18. The cutting tool insert of claim17, wherein the bed material of electrically conductive, flowableparticles comprises graphite.
 19. The cutting tool insert of claim 18,wherein the bed material comprises spherical graphite or carbidedgraphitic material.
 20. The cutting tool insert of claim 1, wherein thecomposite material includes at least one of magnesia and yttria in aproportion of from about 0.01 to about 5% by weight.